Core 3 N355 vs Core i9-8950HK

Intel

Core 3 N355

8 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core i9-8950HK

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core 3 N355

2025

Why buy it

  • +1.2% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
  • Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-8950HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i9-8950HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i9-8950HK

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,502).
  • 200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
  • Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core 3 N355 better than Core i9-8950HK?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i9-8950HK is ahead with a 33.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 N355 pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i9-8950HK also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 3 N355 is the better fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core 3 N355 is the smarter buy today. Core 3 N355 is at an unclear MSRP at $300 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you 1.2% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i9-8950HK is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 33.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (35.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 3 N355 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FCBGA1264 and DDR5 instead of BGA1440, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
1080p
low177 FPS259 FPS
medium142 FPS246 FPS
high114 FPS206 FPS
ultra91 FPS177 FPS
1440p
low145 FPS239 FPS
medium115 FPS194 FPS
high91 FPS158 FPS
ultra72 FPS139 FPS
4K
low68 FPS167 FPS
medium57 FPS138 FPS
high46 FPS106 FPS
ultra36 FPS93 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
1080p
low157 FPS259 FPS
medium135 FPS259 FPS
high122 FPS259 FPS
ultra99 FPS259 FPS
1440p
low134 FPS259 FPS
medium118 FPS259 FPS
high108 FPS259 FPS
ultra89 FPS245 FPS
4K
low106 FPS259 FPS
medium97 FPS259 FPS
high89 FPS240 FPS
ultra72 FPS200 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
1080p
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS
1440p
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS
4K
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra242 FPS259 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
1080p
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS
1440p
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS
4K
low263 FPS259 FPS
medium263 FPS259 FPS
high263 FPS259 FPS
ultra263 FPS259 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 N355 and Core i9-8950HK

Intel

Core 3 N355

The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core i9-8950HK

The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-8950HK offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 N355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-8950HK (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-8950HK uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i9-8950HK's 10,373 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 3 N355. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-8950HK.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz+23%
Base Clock
0.1 GHz
2.9 GHz+2800%
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Twin Lake (2024−2025)
Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
PassMark
10,502+1%
10,373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-8950HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore 3 N355Core i9-8950HK
Socket
FCBGA1264
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0