
Core 3 N355
Popular choices:

Core i9-8950HK
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core 3 N355
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-8950HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i9-8950HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Core i9-8950HK
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,502).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Core 3 N355
2025Core i9-8950HK
2018Why buy it
- ✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1264 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-8950HK across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Core i9-8950HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,373 vs 10,502).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core 3 N355 moves to FCBGA1264 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 3 N355 better than Core i9-8950HK?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 142 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 114 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 145 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 115 FPS | 194 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 138 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 157 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 122 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 118 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 97 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 200 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 259 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 259 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core 3 N355 and Core i9-8950HK

Core 3 N355
Core 3 N355
The Core 3 N355 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 10,502 points. Launch price was $149.

Core i9-8950HK
Core i9-8950HK
The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.
Processing Power
The Core 3 N355 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i9-8950HK offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core 3 N355 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Core 3 N355 versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-8950HK (base: 0.1 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core 3 N355 uses the Twin Lake (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-8950HK uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 3 N355 scores 10,502 against the Core i9-8950HK's 10,373 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 3 N355. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core 3 N355 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-8950HK.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.8 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 0.1 GHz | 2.9 GHz+2800% |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 12 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Twin Lake (2024−2025) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 10,502+1% | 10,373 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 3 N355 uses the FCBGA1264 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i9-8950HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 3 N355 | Core i9-8950HK |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1264 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












