Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon E-2324G

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon E-2324G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon E-2324G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-8950HK

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +45.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E-2324G

2021

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-8950HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (10,339 vs 10,373).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-8950HK better than Xeon E-2324G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2324G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-8950HK is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-8950HK is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 45.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-8950HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-8950HK still makes the most sense overall. Core i9-8950HK comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 45.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E-2324G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i9-8950HK vs Xeon E-2324G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-8950HK

The Core i9-8950HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 10,373 points. Launch price was $583.

Xeon E-2324G

The Xeon E-2324G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,339 points. Launch price was $209.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-8950HK packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2324G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i9-8950HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-8950HK versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon E-2324G — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-8950HK (base: 2.9 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i9-8950HK uses the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2324G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-8950HK scores 10,373 against the Xeon E-2324G's 10,339 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-8950HK. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i9-8950HK vs 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2324G.

Feature	Core i9-8950HK	Xeon E-2324G
Cores / Threads	6 / 12+50%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+4%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.9 GHz	3.1 GHz+7%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+50%	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	10,373	10,339

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-8950HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2324G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.