
Core i9-9900
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7430U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i9-9900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7430U needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7430U.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $423 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7430U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Ryzen 5 7430U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,080 vs 16,238).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-9900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-9900.
Core i9-9900
2019Ryzen 5 7430U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +35.7% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7430U needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7430U.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 3W instead of 65W, a 62W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $423 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 7430U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌2066.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 3W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900 across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,080 vs 16,238).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-9900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-9900.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900 better than Ryzen 5 7430U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 292 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 188 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 240 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 138 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 104 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 403 FPS | 217 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 397 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 337 FPS | 208 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 189 FPS |
| ultra | 273 FPS | 162 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 397 FPS | 276 FPS |
| ultra | 331 FPS | 216 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| high | 406 FPS | 402 FPS |
| ultra | 406 FPS | 370 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i9-9900 and Ryzen 5 7430U

Core i9-9900
Core i9-9900
The Core i9-9900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,238 points. Launch price was $439.


Ryzen 5 7430U
Ryzen 5 7430U
The Ryzen 5 7430U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 3 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,080 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7430U offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900 versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7430U — a 15.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i9-9900 uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7430U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900 scores 16,238 against the Ryzen 5 7430U's 16,080 — a 1% lead for the Core i9-9900. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900 vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 7430U.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+16% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz+35% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 3 MB+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,238 | 16,080 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 7,619 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,637 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,619 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7430U uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7430U). The Core i9-9900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 7430U requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 5 7430U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











