Core i9-9900 vs Xeon 6325P

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9900 vs Xeon 6325P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9900 vs Xeon 6325P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9900

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon 6325P needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon 6325P.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (16,238 vs 16,346).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.4 vs 58.2 PassMark/$ ($423 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Xeon 6325P

2025

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $142 less on MSRP ($281 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.2 vs 38.4 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-9900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-9900.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6325P better than Core i9-9900?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 6325P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9900 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6325P is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6325P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6325P comes in $142 cheaper on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $423 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.7% better PassMark. The compromise is that Core i9-9900 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 51.5% better value on MSRP (58.2 vs 38.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6325P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-9900 vs Xeon 6325P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900

The Core i9-9900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,238 points. Launch price was $439.

Xeon 6325P

The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-9900 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6325P offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i9-9900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900 versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i9-9900 uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6325P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900 scores 16,238 against the Xeon 6325P's 16,346 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon 6325P. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P.

Feature	Core i9-9900	Xeon 6325P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	5 GHz+4%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.5 GHz+13%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)+20380%	1.25 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	Intel 7 nm-50%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)
PassMark	16,238	16,346
Cinebench R23 Multi	7,619	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,637	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	7,619	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6325P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-9900	Xeon 6325P
Socket	LGA1151	LGA1700
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900) / not specified (Xeon 6325P). The Core i9-9900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon 6325P requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i9-9900	Xeon 6325P
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-9900 was priced at $423, while the Xeon 6325P came in at $281. On launch pricing ($423 vs $281), Xeon 6325P was $142 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900 delivers 38.4 pts/$ vs 58.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6325P — making the Xeon 6325P the 41% better value option.

Feature	Core i9-9900	Xeon 6325P
MSRP	$423	$281-34%
Performance per Dollar	38.4	58.2+52%
Release Date	2019	2025

Search Core i9-9900 on Amazon

Search Xeon 6325P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.