
Core i9-9900

Ryzen 7 1800X
Core i9-9900 vs Ryzen 7 1800X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9900 vs Ryzen 7 1800X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9900 vs Ryzen 7 1800X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +20.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $76 less on MSRP ($423 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.4 vs 32.7 PassMark/$ ($423 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 1800X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (7,619 vs 9,314).
Ryzen 7 1800X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+22.2% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.7 vs 38.4 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $423 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-9900 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i9-9900.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900 better than Ryzen 7 1800X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9900 vs Ryzen 7 1800X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900
The Core i9-9900 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 16,238 points. Launch price was $439.


Ryzen 7 1800X
The Ryzen 7 1800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,305 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
Both the Core i9-9900 and Ryzen 7 1800X share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9900 versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1800X — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9900 uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900 scores 16,238 against the Ryzen 7 1800X's 16,305 — a 0.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 1800X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 7,619 vs 9,314 (20% advantage for the Ryzen 7 1800X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,637 vs 1,130, a 36.6% lead for the Core i9-9900 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 7,619 vs 5,700 (28.8% advantage for the Core i9-9900). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900 vs 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1800X.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz+25% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.1 GHz | 3.6 GHz+16% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 16384 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4096 kB+1500% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 16,238 | 16,305 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 7,619 | 9,314+22% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,637+45% | 1,130 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,619+34% | 5,700 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900 uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 1800X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i9-9900) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 1800X) — the Ryzen 7 1800X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z390,B365 (Core i9-9900) and AM4 (Ryzen 7 1800X).
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 20+25% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 1800X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 1800X). The Core i9-9900 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 1800X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 1800X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 1800X rivals Core i7-8700.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9900 was priced at $423, while the Ryzen 7 1800X came in at $499. On launch pricing ($423 vs $499), Core i9-9900 was $76 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900 delivers 38.4 pts/$ vs 32.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 1800X — making the Core i9-9900 the 16.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900 | Ryzen 7 1800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $423-15% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.4+17% | 32.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













