
Core i9-9900X

Ryzen 5 3600
Core i9-9900X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9900X vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9900X vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅83.3% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $790 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 305.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9900X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,500 vs 13,985).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900X better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9900X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9900X packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-9900X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9900X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9900X scores 21,655 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 20.2% lead for the Core i9-9900X. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 13,985 vs 9,500 (38.2% advantage for the Core i9-9900X). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,459 vs 1,295, a 11.9% lead for the Core i9-9900X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 9,475 vs 1,898 (133.2% advantage for the Core i9-9900X). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,655+22% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 13,985+47% | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,459+13% | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,475+399% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9900X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9900X versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Ryzen 5 3600 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9900X) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9900X) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Core i9-9900X offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9900X) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+83% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Core i9-9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9900X was priced at $989, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($989 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $790 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9900X delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 120.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9900X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $989 | $199-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9 | 88.9+306% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














