
Core 5 120

Core i9-9900X
Core 5 120 vs Core i9-9900X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120 vs Core i9-9900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120 vs Core i9-9900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $649 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 190.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $989 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9900X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,655).
Core i9-9900X
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.9 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($989 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9900X better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 vs Core i9-9900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Core i9-9900X
The Core i9-9900X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 21,655 points. Launch price was $989.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-9900X offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Core i9-9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9900X — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Core i9-9900X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Core i9-9900X's 21,655 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i9-9900X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9900X.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz+40% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,655 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,985 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,459 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 9,475 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-9900X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 4 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 44 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9900X).
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 5 120 was priced at $340, while the Core i9-9900X came in at $989. On launch pricing ($340 vs $989), Core 5 120 was $649 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 21.9 pts/$ for the Core i9-9900X — making the Core 5 120 the 97.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Core i9-9900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340-66% | $989 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+190% | 21.9 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















