
Core 5 120

Xeon Gold 5218
Core 5 120 vs Xeon Gold 5218 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120 vs Xeon Gold 5218 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120 vs Xeon Gold 5218: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $933 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 275.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 17.0 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $1,273 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 22 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 5218, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Xeon Gold 5218
2019Why buy it
- ✅+22.2% larger total L3 cache (22 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,586 vs 21,629).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.0 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($1,273 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120 better than Xeon Gold 5218?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 vs Xeon Gold 5218 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Xeon Gold 5218
The Xeon Gold 5218 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2667. Passmark benchmark score: 21,586 points. Launch price was $1,273.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 5218 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 5218 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon Gold 5218 — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Core 5 120 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Xeon Gold 5218's 21,586 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 5 120. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 22 MB on the Xeon Gold 5218.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 16 / 32+167% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+15% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 22 MB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 16 MB+1180% |
| Process | 10 nm-29% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,586 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 5218 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | 2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 768 |
| RAM Channels | — | 6 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 48 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 5218).
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 5 120 was priced at $340, while the Xeon Gold 5218 came in at $1273. On launch pricing ($340 vs $1273), Core 5 120 was $933 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 17.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 5218 — making the Core 5 120 the 115.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon Gold 5218 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340-73% | $1273 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+274% | 17.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















