
Core 5 120

Xeon W-11955M
Core 5 120 vs Xeon W-11955M Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120 vs Xeon W-11955M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120 vs Xeon W-11955M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $283 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 82.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 34.8 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $623 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA1787 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-11955M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,629 vs 21,702).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-11955M, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Xeon W-11955M
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 34.8 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($623 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA1787 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-11955M better than Core 5 120?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 vs Xeon W-11955M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Xeon W-11955M
The Xeon W-11955M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 May 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-H (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1787. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,702 points. Launch price was $623.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-11955M offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-11955M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 5 GHz on the Xeon W-11955M — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon W-11955M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon W-11955M uses Tiger Lake-H (2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Xeon W-11955M's 21,702 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon W-11955M. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon W-11955M.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz | 5 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+19% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 10 nm SuperFin |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Tiger Lake-H (2021) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,702 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-11955M uses FCBGA1787 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1787 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 5 120 was priced at $340, while the Xeon W-11955M came in at $623. On launch pricing ($340 vs $623), Core 5 120 was $283 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 34.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-11955M — making the Core 5 120 the 58.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon W-11955M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340-45% | $623 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+83% | 34.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















