
Core 5 120

Xeon E7-8891 v3
Core 5 120 vs Xeon E7-8891 v3 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core 5 120 vs Xeon E7-8891 v3 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core 5 120 vs Xeon E7-8891 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core 5 120
2025Why buy it
- β +0.1% higher PassMark.
- β Costs $6,501 less on MSRP ($340 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1913.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 3.2 PassMark/$ ($340 MSRP vs $6,841 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E7-8891 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 45 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8891 v3, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E7-8891 v3
2015Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +16.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +150% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (21,615 vs 21,629).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 63.6 PassMark/$ ($6,841 MSRP vs $340 MSRP).
- β153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Core 5 120 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core 5 120 better than Xeon E7-8891 v3?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core 5 120 vs Xeon E7-8891 v3 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core 5 120
The Core 5 120 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,629 points. Launch price was $211.

Xeon E7-8891 v3
The Xeon E7-8891 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EX (2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600. Passmark benchmark score: 21,615 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core 5 120 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 offers 10 cores / 20 threads β the Xeon E7-8891 v3 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core 5 120 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E7-8891 v3 β a 25% clock advantage for the Core 5 120 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core 5 120 uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses Haswell-EX (2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core 5 120 scores 21,629 against the Xeon E7-8891 v3's 21,615 β a 0.1% lead for the Core 5 120. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core 5 120 vs 45 MB (total) on the Xeon E7-8891 v3.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+29% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz+12% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 45 MB (total)+150% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 256K (per core)+20380% |
| Process | 10 nm-55% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023β2025) | Haswell-EX (2015) |
| PassMark | 21,629 | 21,615 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 9,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core 5 120 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 1536 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 4 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 32 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core 5 120) / Yes (Xeon E7-8891 v3).
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core 5 120 was priced at $340, while the Xeon E7-8891 v3 came in at $6841. On launch pricing ($340 vs $6841), Core 5 120 was $6501 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 5 120 delivers 63.6 pts/$ vs 3.2 pts/$ for the Xeon E7-8891 v3 β making the Core 5 120 the 181.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core 5 120 | Xeon E7-8891 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $340-95% | $6841 |
| Performance per Dollar | 63.6+1888% | 3.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2015 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















