
Core i9-9920X

Ryzen 5 3600
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen 5 3600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen 5 3600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9920X
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 88.9 PassMark/$ ($1,189 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌153.8% higher power demand at 165W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 3600.
Ryzen 5 3600
2019Why buy it
- ✅+66.2% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $990 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 323.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 88.9 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,189 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 165W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (17,685 vs 24,974).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9920X better than Ryzen 5 3600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9920X vs Ryzen 5 3600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9920X
The Core i9-9920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 165 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,974 points. Launch price was $1,189.


Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9920X packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9920X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i9-9920X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-9920X (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9920X uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9920X scores 24,974 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 34.2% lead for the Core i9-9920X. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9920X vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+7% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | 3.6 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+66% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 24,974+41% | 17,685 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,295 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9920X uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | No |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9920X) / Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
| Target Use | — | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9920X was priced at $1189, while the Ryzen 5 3600 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($1189 vs $199), Ryzen 5 3600 was $990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9920X delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 88.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 123.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9920X | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1189 | $199-83% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.0 | 88.9+323% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














