Core i9-9980HK vs Ryzen 5 2600X

Core i9-9980HK vs Ryzen 5 2600X Performance Spectrum

Core i9-9980HK

8 / 16

13,966

+0.6%

13,880

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9980HK vs Ryzen 5 2600X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9980HK vs Ryzen 5 2600X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9980HK

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600X.

Ryzen 5 2600X

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9980HK.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9980HK across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (13,880 vs 13,966).
❌Launch MSRP is still $229 MSRP, while Core i9-9980HK mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9980HK better than Ryzen 5 2600X?

Yes. Core i9-9980HK is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9980HK is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 16.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9980HK is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-9980HK is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 5 2600X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-9980HK comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $229 MSRP, and it still gives you a 16.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 2600X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (60.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-9980HK makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-9980HK vs Ryzen 5 2600X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9980HK

The Core i9-9980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,966 points. Launch price was $583.

Ryzen 5 2600X

The Ryzen 5 2600X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.25 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,880 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-9980HK packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600X offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i9-9980HK has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i9-9980HK versus 4.25 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600X — a 16.2% clock advantage for the Core i9-9980HK (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i9-9980HK uses the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600X uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9980HK scores 13,966 against the Ryzen 5 2600X's 13,880 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i9-9980HK. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i9-9980HK	Ryzen 5 2600X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	5 GHz+18%	4.25 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.6 GHz+50%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-HR (2019)	Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark	13,966	13,880
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	7,514
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,242
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	5,247

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9980HK uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i9-9980HK	Ryzen 5 2600X
Socket	BGA1440	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	—	64 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	24

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core i9-9980HK) / AMD-V (Ryzen 5 2600X). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600X targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600X rivals Core i5-9600K.