Core M-5Y71 vs Turion II M520

Intel

Core M-5Y71

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2014
VS
AMD

Turion II M520

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2009

Core M-5Y71 vs Turion II M520 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core M-5Y71 vs Turion II M520 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core M-5Y71 vs Turion II M520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core M-5Y71

2014

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Turion II M520 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
    • 51100% higher power demand at 512W vs 1W.

    Turion II M520

    2009

    Why buy it

    • Draws 1W instead of 512W, a 511W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,955 vs 1,975).

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core M-5Y71 better than Turion II M520?
    Yes. Core M-5Y71 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core M-5Y71 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y71 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core M-5Y71 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y71 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core M-5Y71 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core M-5Y71 vs Turion II M520 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core M-5Y71

    The Core M-5Y71 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,975 points. Launch price was $281.

    AMD

    Turion II M520

    The Turion II M520 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Caspian (2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,955 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    The Core M-5Y71 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion II M520's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.9 GHz on the Core M-5Y71 versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion II M520 — a 23.1% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y71. The Core M-5Y71 uses the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture (14 nm), while the Turion II M520 uses Caspian (2009) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core M-5Y71 scores 1,975 against the Turion II M520's 1,955 — a 1% lead for the Core M-5Y71.

    FeatureCore M-5Y71Turion II M520
    Cores / Threads
    2 / 4
    2 / 2
    Boost Clock
    2.9 GHz+26%
    2.3 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.2 GHz
    L3 Cache
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)+25500%
    1 MB
    Process
    14 nm-69%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Broadwell-Y (2014)
    Caspian (2009)
    PassMark
    1,975+1%
    1,955
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core M-5Y71 uses the FCBGA1234 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion II M520 uses S1g3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore M-5Y71Turion II M520
    Socket
    FCBGA1234
    S1g3
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0