Core i7-3689Y vs Core M-5Y71

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-3689Y vs Core M-5Y71 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-3689Y vs Core M-5Y71: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-3689Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Core M-5Y71 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,967 vs 1,975).

Core M-5Y71

2014

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Core i7-3689Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-3689Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core M-5Y71 better than Core i7-3689Y?

Yes. Core M-5Y71 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core M-5Y71 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.5% more average FPS across 30 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core M-5Y71 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core M-5Y71 is the better buy right now. Core M-5Y71 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $281 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.5% average FPS lead across 30 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (7.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core M-5Y71 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-3689Y vs Core M-5Y71 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-3689Y

The Core i7-3689Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,967 points. Launch price was $69.

Core M-5Y71

The Core M-5Y71 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 October 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-Y (2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1234. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,975 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-3689Y and Core M-5Y71 share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-3689Y versus 2.9 GHz on the Core M-5Y71 — a 10.9% clock advantage for the Core M-5Y71 (base: 1.5 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The Core i7-3689Y uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core M-5Y71 uses Broadwell-Y (2014) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-3689Y scores 1,967 against the Core M-5Y71's 1,975 — a 0.4% lead for the Core M-5Y71. Both processors carry 4 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-3689Y	Core M-5Y71
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	2.9 GHz+12%
Base Clock	1.5 GHz+25%	1.2 GHz
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Broadwell-Y (2014)
PassMark	1,967	1,975
Geekbench 6 Single	507	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,100	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-3689Y uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core M-5Y71 uses FCBGA1234 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-3689Y	Core M-5Y71
Socket	BGA1023	FCBGA1234
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3689Y) / not specified (Core M-5Y71). The Core i7-3689Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Core M-5Y71 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3689Y targets Ultra-Low Power Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i7-3689Y rivals AMD A10-4655M.