A8-6500T vs Core i7-3689Y

A8-6500T vs Core i7-3689Y Performance Spectrum

A8-6500T

4 / 4

1,983

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i7-3689Y

2 / 4

1,967

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A8-6500T vs Core i7-3689Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A8-6500T vs Core i7-3689Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A8-6500T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 512W, a 467W reduction.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike Core i7-3689Y.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-3689Y

2013

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,967 vs 1,983).
❌1037.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 45W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A8-6500T.

Quick Answers

So, is A8-6500T better than Core i7-3689Y?

Yes. A8-6500T is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 28 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.8% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A8-6500T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.0% more average FPS across 28 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A8-6500T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A8-6500T still makes the most sense overall. A8-6500T comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.0% average FPS lead across 28 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A8-6500T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A8-6500T vs Core i7-3689Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A8-6500T

The A8-6500T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,983 points. Launch price was $90.

Core i7-3689Y

The Core i7-3689Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,967 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The A8-6500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-3689Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A8-6500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the A8-6500T versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-3689Y — a 17.5% clock advantage for the A8-6500T (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A8-6500T uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-3689Y uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A8-6500T scores 1,983 against the Core i7-3689Y's 1,967 — a 0.8% lead for the A8-6500T.

Feature	A8-6500T	Core i7-3689Y
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+19%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+40%	1.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256K (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark	1,983	1,967
Geekbench 6 Single	—	507
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,100

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A8-6500T uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-3689Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1866 on the A8-6500T versus DDR3L-1600 on the Core i7-3689Y — the A8-6500T supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A8-6500T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FM2 (A8-6500T) and HM77,QM77 (Core i7-3689Y).

Feature	A8-6500T	Core i7-3689Y
Socket	FM2	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	1866+17%	DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (A8-6500T) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-3689Y). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8550D (A8-6500T) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i7-3689Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-3689Y targets Ultra-Low Power Laptop. Direct competitor: A8-6500T rivals Core i3-3220T; Core i7-3689Y rivals AMD A10-4655M.

Feature	A8-6500T	Core i7-3689Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon HD 8550D	Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	true	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Ultra-Low Power Laptop