Core m3-6Y30 vs A10-5750M

CPU

GPU

Core m3-6Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015

A10-5750M

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core m3-6Y30

2 / 4

2,180

+0.3%

2,174

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-6Y30 is positioned at rank 1136 and the A10-5750M is on rank 1227, so the Core m3-6Y30 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-6Y30

#1124

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3781%

#1125

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3726%

#1126

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3420%

#1127

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3405%

#1128

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3373%

#1130

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3258%

#1131

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3124%

#1132

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3119%

#1133

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3035%

#1136

Core m3-6Y30

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1137

Core i3-2340UE

MSRP: $200|Avg: $200

100%

#1138

Core i7-2820QM

MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A

99%

#1139

Core i5-520M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1141

Celeron 807

MSRP: $70|Avg: $10

98%

#1142

Pentium B950

MSRP: $134|Avg: $35

98%

#1143

Celeron 220

MSRP: $42|Avg: $42

98%

#1144

Pentium B960

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

98%

#1146

Pentium 957

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

98%

#1147

Core 2 Duo SL9400

MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A

97%

#1149

Pentium N3540

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

97%

#1150

Core i7-3555LE

MSRP: $300|Avg: $280

96%

#1151

Core i3-2377M

MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5750M

#1215

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

7428%

#1216

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

7319%

#1217

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

6719%

#1218

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

6689%

#1219

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

6627%

#1221

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

6400%

#1222

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

6137%

#1223

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

6127%

#1224

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

5962%

#1227

A10-5750M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1228

Core i7-620UM

MSRP: $278|Avg: N/A

99%

#1230

Celeron 570

MSRP: $134|Avg: $15

95%

#1231

Core i7-820QM

MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A

84%

#1233

Core Duo T2700

MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A

71%

#1235

Pentium SU4100

MSRP: $289|Avg: $15

60%

#1236

Core Solo T1400

MSRP: $200|Avg: $5

54%

#1237

Core i7-940XM

MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A

52%

#1238

Core Solo T1350

MSRP: $200|Avg: $70

51%

#1240

Core Solo T1300

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

47%

#1241

Core Solo T1200

MSRP: $209|Avg: $10

43%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A10-5750M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core m3-6Y30 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core m3-6Y30	A10-5750M
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($281)	✅ More affordable ($0)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Insight	Core m3-6Y30	A10-5750M
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($281)	✅ More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core m3-6Y30 Benchmark Check

A10-5750M Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-6Y30 and A10-5750M

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

A10-5750M

The A10-5750M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,174 points. Launch price was $130.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-6Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A10-5750M offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A10-5750M has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 versus 3.5 GHz on the A10-5750M — a 45.6% clock advantage for the A10-5750M (base: 0.9 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core m3-6Y30 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the A10-5750M uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-6Y30 scores 2,180 against the A10-5750M's 2,174 — a 0.3% lead for the Core m3-6Y30. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30 vs 0 kB on the A10-5750M.

Feature	Core m3-6Y30	A10-5750M
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.5 GHz+59%
Base Clock	0.9 GHz	2.5 GHz+178%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	0 kB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake-Y (2015)	Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,180	2,174
Geekbench 6 Single	—	320
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	707

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-6Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-5750M uses FS1r2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core m3-6Y30	A10-5750M
Socket	FCBGA1515	FS1r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	—	32 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-6Y30) / AMD-V (A10-5750M). The A10-5750M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8650G), while the Core m3-6Y30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-5750M targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A10-5750M rivals Core i3-3110M.