Core m3-6Y30
VS
Celeron J3455E

Core m3-6Y30 vs Celeron J3455E

Intel

Core m3-6Y30

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Celeron J3455E

4 Cores4 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Core m3-6Y30 is positioned at rank #1136 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core m3-6Y30

#1124
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3781%
#1125
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3726%
#1126
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3420%
#1127
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3405%
#1128
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3373%
#1130
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3258%
#1131
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3124%
#1132
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3119%
#1133
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3035%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
100%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
99%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1141
Celeron 807
MSRP: $70|Avg: $10
98%
#1142
Pentium B950
MSRP: $134|Avg: $35
98%
#1143
Celeron 220
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#1144
Pentium B960
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
98%
#1146
Pentium 957
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1147
Core 2 Duo SL9400
MSRP: $284|Avg: N/A
97%
#1149
Pentium N3540
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
#1150
Core i7-3555LE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
96%
#1151
Core i3-2377M
MSRP: $250|Avg: N/A
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J3455E (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore m3-6Y30Celeron J3455E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm)
✨ Modern (Legacy / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core m3-6Y30 (2015) relies on 14 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore m3-6Y30Celeron J3455E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($281)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-6Y30 and Celeron J3455E

Intel

Core m3-6Y30

The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

Intel

Celeron J3455E

The Celeron J3455E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s. Passmark benchmark score: 2,193 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core m3-6Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron J3455E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Celeron J3455E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 versus 2.3 GHz on the Celeron J3455E — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Celeron J3455E (base: 0.9 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Core m3-6Y30 is built on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. In PassMark, the Core m3-6Y30 scores 2,180 against the Celeron J3455E's 2,193 — a 0.6% lead for the Celeron J3455E. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30 vs 2 MB on the Celeron J3455E.

FeatureCore m3-6Y30Celeron J3455E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz+5%
Base Clock
0.9 GHz
1.5 GHz+67%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)+100%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Skylake-Y (2015)
PassMark
2,180
2,193
Geekbench 6 Single
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
850
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-6Y30) / VT-x (Celeron J3455E). The Celeron J3455E includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 500), while the Core m3-6Y30 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron J3455E targets Low Power. Direct competitor: Celeron J3455E rivals Pentium J4205.

FeatureCore m3-6Y30Celeron J3455E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Low Power