
Core m3-6Y30 vs Athlon II X4 630

Core m3-6Y30

Athlon II X4 630
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core m3-6Y30 is positioned at rank 1136 and the Athlon II X4 630 is on rank 868, so the Athlon II X4 630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core m3-6Y30
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 630
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Skylake-Y (2015) / 14 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1769%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($281) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core m3-6Y30 and Athlon II X4 630

Core m3-6Y30
The Core m3-6Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,180 points. Launch price was $281.

Athlon II X4 630
The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.
Processing Power
The Core m3-6Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 630 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Core m3-6Y30 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 — a 24% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 0.9 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core m3-6Y30 uses the Skylake-Y (2015) architecture (14 nm), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-6Y30 scores 2,180 against the Athlon II X4 630's 2,175 — a 0.2% lead for the Core m3-6Y30. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Core m3-6Y30 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630.
| Feature | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.2 GHz | 2.8 GHz+27% |
| Base Clock | 0.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz+211% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Skylake-Y (2015) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,180 | 2,175 |
Memory & Platform
The Core m3-6Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1515 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core m3-6Y30) / AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630).
| Feature | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core m3-6Y30 launched at $281 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 630 debuted at $129. At current prices ($281 vs $15), the Athlon II X4 630 is $266 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-6Y30 delivers 7.8 pts/$ vs 145.0 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 630 — making the Athlon II X4 630 the 179.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core m3-6Y30 | Athlon II X4 630 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $281 | $129-54% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $281 | $15-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.8 | 145.0+1759% |
| Release Date | 2015 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















