PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium G4500T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium G4500T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y30

2016

Why buy it

✅+9.6% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 512W, a 508W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $75 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Pentium G4500T.

Pentium G4500T

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $206 less on MSRP ($75 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 271.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($75 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock), unlike Core m3-7Y30.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (701 vs 768).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (1,260 vs 1,481).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌11277.8% higher power demand at 512W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y30 better than Pentium G4500T?

Yes. Core m3-7Y30 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 17.5% better Geekbench multi-core, 0.8% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m3-7Y30 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 17.5% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y30 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core m3-7Y30 comes in 274.7% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $75 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium G4500T only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2015 platform. Even with 271.7% better value on paper (32.0 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2015), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium G4500T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium G4500T

The Pentium G4500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,399 points. Launch price was $75.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium G4500T's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G4500T — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Pentium G4500T (base: 1 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G4500T uses Skylake (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Pentium G4500T's 2,399 — a 0.8% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 768 vs 701, a 9.1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,481 vs 1,260 (16.1% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 3 MB on the Pentium G4500T.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium G4500T
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz	3 GHz+15%
Base Clock	1 GHz	3 GHz+200%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Skylake (2015−2016)
PassMark	2,418	2,399
Cinebench R23 Multi	645	—
Geekbench 6 Single	768+10%	701
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,481+18%	1,260

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G4500T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR4-2133 on the Pentium G4500T — the Pentium G4500T supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Pentium G4500T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 16 (Pentium G4500T) — the Pentium G4500T offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30) and H110,B150,H170,Z170 (Pentium G4500T).

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium G4500T
Socket	FCBGA1515	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600	DDR4-2133+14%
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	64 GB+300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) vs VT-x, VT-d (Pentium G4500T). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) and Intel HD Graphics 530 (Pentium G4500T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable, Pentium G4500T targets Low Power Desktop.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium G4500T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 615	Intel HD Graphics 530
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Ultra-portable	Low Power Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m3-7Y30 was priced at $281, while the Pentium G4500T came in at $75. On launch pricing ($281 vs $75), Pentium G4500T was $206 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y30 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G4500T — making the Pentium G4500T the 115.2% better value option.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium G4500T
MSRP	$281	$75-73%
Performance per Dollar	8.6	32.0+272%
Release Date	2016	2015

Search Core m3-7Y30 on Amazon

Search Pentium G4500T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.