PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium P6200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium P6200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core m3-7Y30

2016

Why buy it

✅+284% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 5W instead of 35W, a 31W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.6 vs 39.9 PassMark/$ ($281 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).

Pentium P6200

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $221 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅Delivers 363.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.9 vs 8.6 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $281 MSRP).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 10) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (200 vs 768).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (400 vs 1,481).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 4 MB).
❌677.8% higher power demand at 35W vs 4.5W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core m3-7Y30 better than Pentium P6200?

Yes. Core m3-7Y30 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 270.3% better Geekbench multi-core, 1.0% higher PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core m3-7Y30 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core m3-7Y30 is the stronger fit. You are getting 270.3% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core m3-7Y30 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core m3-7Y30 comes in 368.3% more expensive on MSRP at $281 MSRP versus $60 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Pentium P6200 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2010 platform. Even with 363.7% better value on paper (39.9 vs 8.6 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on PGA988.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core m3-7Y30 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2010), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 3 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core m3-7Y30 vs Pentium P6200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core m3-7Y30

The Core m3-7Y30 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1515. Thermal design power (TDP): 4.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,418 points. Launch price was $281.

Pentium P6200

The Pentium P6200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.13 GHz, with boost up to 0.13 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,394 points. Launch price was $60.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core m3-7Y30 packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium P6200's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core m3-7Y30 versus 0.13 GHz on the Pentium P6200 — a 181% clock advantage for the Core m3-7Y30 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.13 GHz). The Core m3-7Y30 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium P6200 uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core m3-7Y30 scores 2,418 against the Pentium P6200's 2,394 — a 1% lead for the Core m3-7Y30. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 768 vs 200, a 117.4% lead for the Core m3-7Y30 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,481 vs 400 (114.9% advantage for the Core m3-7Y30). L3 cache: 4 MB on the Core m3-7Y30 vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6200.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium P6200
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+1900%	0.13 GHz
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.13 GHz+113%
L3 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark	2,418+1%	2,394
Cinebench R23 Multi	645	—
Geekbench 6 Single	768+284%	200
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,481+270%	400

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core m3-7Y30 uses the FCBGA1515 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium P6200 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600 on the Core m3-7Y30 versus DDR3-1066 on the Pentium P6200 — the Core m3-7Y30 supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core m3-7Y30 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 10 (Core m3-7Y30) vs 16 (Pentium P6200) — the Pentium P6200 offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Kaby Lake-Y SoC (Core m3-7Y30) and HM55,HM57 (Pentium P6200).

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium P6200
Socket	FCBGA1515	PGA988
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	LPDDR3-1866 / DDR3L-1600+75%	DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB+100%	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	10	16+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core m3-7Y30) vs None (Pentium P6200). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 615 (Core m3-7Y30) and Intel HD Graphics (Pentium P6200) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core m3-7Y30 targets Ultra-portable, Pentium P6200 targets Legacy Laptop.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium P6200
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 615	Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	None
Target Use	Ultra-portable	Legacy Laptop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core m3-7Y30 was priced at $281, while the Pentium P6200 came in at $60. On launch pricing ($281 vs $60), Pentium P6200 was $221 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core m3-7Y30 delivers 8.6 pts/$ vs 39.9 pts/$ for the Pentium P6200 — making the Pentium P6200 the 129% better value option.

Feature	Core m3-7Y30	Pentium P6200
MSRP	$281	$60-79%
Performance per Dollar	8.6	39.9+364%
Release Date	2016	2010

Search Core m3-7Y30 on Amazon

Search Pentium P6200 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.