Core Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 1.40

Intel

Core Solo T1200

1 Cores1 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium M 1.40

1 Cores1 Thrd24 WWMax: 1.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······

Core Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 1.40 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 1.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 1.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1200

2006

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 24W, a 22W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Pentium M 1.40 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Pentium M 1.40

2003

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (345 vs 355).
    • 1100% higher power demand at 24W vs 2W.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Solo T1200 better than Pentium M 1.40?
    Yes. Core Solo T1200 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 2.9% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Solo T1200 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 7.1% higher max boost clock.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Solo T1200 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Solo T1200 is the better buy right now. Core Solo T1200 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $209 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 2.9% higher PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (1.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Solo T1200 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2006 vs 2003) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core Solo T1200 vs Pentium M 1.40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core Solo T1200

    The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.

    Intel

    Pentium M 1.40

    The Pentium M 1.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Banias (2003) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 24 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

    Processing Power

    Both the Core Solo T1200 and Pentium M 1.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 versus 1.4 GHz on the Pentium M 1.40 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1200. The Core Solo T1200 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Pentium M 1.40 uses Banias (2003) (130 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1200 scores 355 against the Pentium M 1.40's 345 — a 2.9% lead for the Core Solo T1200. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureCore Solo T1200Pentium M 1.40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    1.5 GHz+7%
    1.4 GHz
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    2 MB+100%
    1 MB
    Process
    65 nm-50%
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Yonah (2005−2006)
    Banias (2003)
    PassMark
    355+3%
    345
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core Solo T1200 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Pentium M 1.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore Solo T1200Pentium M 1.40
    Socket
    BGA479
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 1.1
    PCIe 1.1