Core Solo T1200 vs Sempron LE-1100

Core Solo T1200 vs Sempron LE-1100 Performance Spectrum

Core Solo T1200

1 / 1

355

0.0%

376

+5.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Solo T1200 vs Sempron LE-1100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Solo T1200 vs Sempron LE-1100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Solo T1200

2006

Why buy it

✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 43W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (355 vs 376).
❌Launch MSRP is still $209 MSRP, while Sempron LE-1100 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Sempron LE-1100

2007

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌2150% higher power demand at 45W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

So, is Sempron LE-1100 better than Core Solo T1200?

Yes. Sempron LE-1100 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 5.9% better PassMark and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Sempron LE-1100 has the edge because it leads the single-thread side of this matchup with 26.7% higher max boost clock.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Sempron LE-1100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 5.9% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 1 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Sempron LE-1100 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Sempron LE-1100 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $209 MSRP, and it still gives you 5.9% higher PassMark. Core Solo T1200 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Sempron LE-1100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2007 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 1 cores / 1 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core Solo T1200 vs Sempron LE-1100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Solo T1200

The Core Solo T1200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: BGA479. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 355 points. Launch price was $249.

Sempron LE-1100

The Sempron LE-1100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sparta (2007) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 376 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Solo T1200 and Sempron LE-1100 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the Core Solo T1200 versus 1.9 GHz on the Sempron LE-1100 — a 23.5% clock advantage for the Sempron LE-1100. The Core Solo T1200 uses the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture (65 nm), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses Sparta (2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core Solo T1200 scores 355 against the Sempron LE-1100's 376 — a 5.7% lead for the Sempron LE-1100. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Solo T1200	Sempron LE-1100
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	1.9 GHz+27%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	256 kB
Process	65 nm	65 nm
Architecture	Yonah (2005−2006)	Sparta (2007)
PassMark	355	376+6%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Solo T1200 uses the BGA479 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Sempron LE-1100 uses AM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.