
Core Ultra 5 134U

Ryzen 5 2600
Core Ultra 5 134U vs Ryzen 5 2600 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 134U vs Ryzen 5 2600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 134U vs Ryzen 5 2600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 134U
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on FCBGA2551 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 5 2600.
Ryzen 5 2600
2018Why buy it
- β +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Ultra 5 134U.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 134U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (13,145 vs 13,169).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Core Ultra 5 134U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 134U moves to FCBGA2551 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 134U better than Ryzen 5 2600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 134U vs Ryzen 5 2600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 134U
The Core Ultra 5 134U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 0.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2551. Thermal design power (TDP): +Β 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 13,169 points. Launch price was $332.


Ryzen 5 2600
The Ryzen 5 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,145 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 134U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 5 2600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads β the Core Ultra 5 134U has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 134U versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600 β a 12% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 134U (base: 0.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 134U uses the Meteor Lake-U (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 134U scores 13,169 against the Ryzen 5 2600's 13,145 β a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 134U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 134U vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 134U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 14+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 0.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+386% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 3 MB+50% |
| Process | 7 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Meteor Lake-U (2023) | Pinnacle Riege (Zen+) (2018) |
| PassMark | 13,169 | 13,145 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 6,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,163 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 4,893 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 134U uses the FCBGA2551 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 2600 uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 134U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA2551 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | β | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | β | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | β | 2 |
| ECC Support | β | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | β | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 134U) / Yes (Ryzen 5 2600). Primary use case: Ryzen 5 2600 targets General Productivity. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 2600 rivals Core i5-9400.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 134U | Ryzen 5 2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | β | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | Yes |
| Target Use | β | General Productivity |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













