Core Ultra 5 135U
VS
Core i9-10980HK

Core Ultra 5 135U vs Core i9-10980HK

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

12 Cores14 Thrd0 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2023
VS
Intel

Core i9-10980HK

8 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 135U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
106%
#73
Core i9-13950HX
MSRP: $590|Avg: $199
103%
#77
Core Ultra 5 135U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i9-10980HK

#187
Core Ultra 9 288V
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
128%
#188
Core i7-10870H
MSRP: $417|Avg: N/A
127%
#202
Core i9-10980HK
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i9-10980HK delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core Ultra 5 135U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore Ultra 5 135UCore i9-10980HK
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Meteor Lake-P (2023) / 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-H (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore Ultra 5 135UCore i9-10980HK
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 135U and Core i9-10980HK

Intel

Core Ultra 5 135U

The Core Ultra 5 135U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 12 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 16,900 points. Launch price was $332.

Intel

Core i9-10980HK

The Core i9-10980HK is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,037 points. Launch price was $583.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 135U packs 12 cores / 14 threads, while the Core i9-10980HK offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 135U has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 135U versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-10980HK — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-10980HK (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the Meteor Lake-P (2023) architecture (7 nm), while the Core i9-10980HK uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 135U scores 16,900 against the Core i9-10980HK's 17,037 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i9-10980HK. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 135U vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-10980HK.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135UCore i9-10980HK
Cores / Threads
12 / 14+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz
5.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.4 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Meteor Lake-P (2023)
Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark
16,900
17,037
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,315
Geekbench 6 Single
1,948
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,000
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 135U uses the FCBGA2049 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-10980HK uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135UCore i9-10980HK
Socket
FCBGA2049
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5600
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: Yes (Core Ultra 5 135U) / not specified (Core i9-10980HK). The Core Ultra 5 135U includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the Core i9-10980HK requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 135UCore i9-10980HK
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
Yes