Core Ultra 5 225T
VS
EPYC 72F3

Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 72F3

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025
VS
AMD

EPYC 72F3

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2021

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225T

#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
105%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
105%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
105%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
104%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
104%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
104%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
104%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
104%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
103%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
103%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
102%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
102%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
101%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
101%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
100%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
100%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
100%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
100%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
99%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
99%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
99%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
99%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
99%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
98%
#71
Core i5-14490F
MSRP: $209|Avg: $190
97%
#72
Core i5-12600KF
MSRP: $264|Avg: $190
97%
#73
Core i5-13600KF
MSRP: $249|Avg: $258
97%
#74
Ryzen 5 5500GT
MSRP: $125|Avg: $130
97%
#75
Ryzen 7 1700
MSRP: $140|Avg: $185
71%
#75
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
MSRP: $309|Avg: $140
97%
#76
Ryzen 7 7700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $249
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 72F3

#389
Xeon Gold 5220R
MSRP: $1780|Avg: $1015
106%
#390
EPYC 9555P
MSRP: $7983|Avg: $6130
106%
#391
Xeon Gold 5218
MSRP: $1273|Avg: $500
106%
#392
EPYC 9374F
MSRP: $4850|Avg: $3466
105%
#393
Xeon Gold 6448Y
MSRP: $3583|Avg: N/A
105%
#394
EPYC 9454
MSRP: $5225|Avg: $576
105%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
MSRP: $2399|Avg: $1000
104%
#396
Xeon Platinum 8461V
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
104%
#397
Xeon W-3235
MSRP: $1538|Avg: $1538
104%
#398
Xeon w9-3595X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6000
103%
#399
Xeon W-3365
MSRP: $3499|Avg: $3499
102%
#400
EPYC 7713P
MSRP: $5010|Avg: $2443
101%
#401
Xeon W-2145
MSRP: $1113|Avg: $145
101%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
101%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
100%
#404
EPYC 72F3
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
99%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
99%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
98%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
98%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
96%
#411
Xeon w9-3495X
MSRP: $5889|Avg: $6333
96%
#412
Xeon Gold 5320T
MSRP: $1977|Avg: $1379
95%
#413
EPYC 7643
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $2750
95%
#414
Xeon Gold 6330N
MSRP: $2389|Avg: $1798
95%
#415
EPYC 7473X
MSRP: $3900|Avg: $200
95%
#416
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
MSRP: $5489|Avg: $3486
95%
#417
EPYC 9474F
MSRP: $6780|Avg: $3723
94%
#418
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
MSRP: $11699|Avg: $11699
94%
#419
Xeon 6736P
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 72F3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 5 225TEPYC 72F3
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 5 225T ($180), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($180 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 5 225TEPYC 72F3
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and EPYC 72F3

Intel

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

EPYC 72F3

The EPYC 72F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 27,252 points. Launch price was $2,468.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the EPYC 72F3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 4.1 GHz on the EPYC 72F3 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 72F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the EPYC 72F3's 27,252 — a 1.4% lead for the EPYC 72F3. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 72F3.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TEPYC 72F3
Cores / Threads
10 / 10+25%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+20%
4.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
3.7 GHz+48%
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)
256 MB (total)+1180%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+500%
512 kB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
7 nm+
Architecture
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Milan (2021−2023)
PassMark
26,874
27,252+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
2,677
Geekbench 6 Multi
8,943
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 72F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TEPYC 72F3
Socket
LGA1851
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
Max RAM Capacity
256 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (EPYC 72F3). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the EPYC 72F3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 225TEPYC 72F3
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc Graphics (16EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget