
Core Ultra 5 225T

M2 Max
Core Ultra 5 225T vs M2 Max Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 225T vs M2 Max FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 225T vs M2 Max: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 225T
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 48 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while M2 Max mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌80.6% higher power demand at 65W vs 36W.
M2 Max
2023Why buy it
- ✅+140% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 20 MB).
- ✅Draws 36W instead of 65W, a 29W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (26,824 vs 26,874).
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than M2 Max?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 225T vs M2 Max Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.
M2 Max
The M2 Max is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 17 January 2023 (2 years ago). It features 12 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.424 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB. L2 cache: 36 MB. Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: none. Thermal design power (TDP): 36 MB + 48 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,824 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the M2 Max offers 12 cores / 12 threads — the M2 Max has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 3.7 GHz on the M2 Max — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.424 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T is built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the M2 Max's 26,824 — a 0.2% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 48 MB on the M2 Max.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 12 / 12+20% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+32% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+3% | 2.424 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 48 MB+140% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 36 MB+1100% |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 26,874 | 26,824 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,943 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M2 Max uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Core Ultra 5 225T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 166.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 225T) vs 4 (M2 Max). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 5 225T) vs 0 (M2 Max) — the Core Ultra 5 225T offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | LPDDR5-6400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+167% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) vs Virtualization (M2 Max). Both include integrated graphics — Arc Graphics (16EU) (Core Ultra 5 225T) and Apple M2 Max GPU (M2 Max) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget, M2 Max targets Mobile. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | M2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics (16EU) | Apple M2 Max GPU |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Virtualization |
| Target Use | Budget | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














