Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451
Core Ultra 5 225T
EPYC 7451
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 225T
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7451
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225T | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Naples (2017−2018) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 225T | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($180) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 225T and EPYC 7451
Core Ultra 5 225T
The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.
EPYC 7451
The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the EPYC 7451 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 — a 42% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7451 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the EPYC 7451's 26,639 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 10 | 24 / 48+140% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+53% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+220% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-79% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Naples (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 26,874 | 26,639 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,677 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,943 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7451 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | ❌ | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (EPYC 7451). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the EPYC 7451 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 225T | EPYC 7451 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Arc Graphics (16EU) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 225T and EPYC 7451
