Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451

Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451 Performance Spectrum

Core Ultra 5 225T

10 / 10

26,874

+0.9%

26,639

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core Ultra 5 225T

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Arc Graphics (16EU), while EPYC 7451 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7451, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $240 MSRP, while EPYC 7451 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7451

2017

Why buy it

✅+220% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225T across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (26,639 vs 26,874).
❌176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 225T moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 225T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Ultra 5 225T better than EPYC 7451?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7451 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core Ultra 5 225T is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225T is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225T is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Ultra 5 225T is the better buy right now. Core Ultra 5 225T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $240 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (112.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core Ultra 5 225T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2017), a healthier platform with LGA1851 and DDR5 instead of TR4, and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 24/48. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core Ultra 5 225T vs EPYC 7451 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core Ultra 5 225T

The Core Ultra 5 225T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 26,874 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7451

The EPYC 7451 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017−2018) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 26,639 points. Launch price was $2,400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 225T packs 10 cores / 10 threads, while the EPYC 7451 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 7451 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225T versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7451 — a 42% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 225T (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7451 uses Naples (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 225T scores 26,874 against the EPYC 7451's 26,639 — a 0.9% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225T. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225T vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7451.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225T	EPYC 7451
Cores / Threads	10 / 10	24 / 48+140%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+53%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+9%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+220%
L2 Cache	3 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+16967%
Process	3 nm-79%	14 nm
Architecture	Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)	Naples (2017−2018)
PassMark	26,874	26,639
Geekbench 6 Single	2,677	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	8,943	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 225T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7451 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 225T	EPYC 7451
Socket	LGA1851	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-6400	—
Max RAM Capacity	256 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	24	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 225T) / not specified (EPYC 7451). The Core Ultra 5 225T includes integrated graphics (Arc Graphics (16EU)), while the EPYC 7451 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 5 225T targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225T rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.