Core Ultra 5 226V
VS
Core i7-10700K

Core Ultra 5 226V vs Core i7-10700K

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

8 Cores8 Thrd17 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Core i7-10700K

8 Cores16 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 226V

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
109%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
108%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
107%
#96
Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
100%
#97
Core Ultra 5 226V
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#101
Core i5-1350P
MSRP: $320|Avg: $250
96%
#102
Core i3-1220P
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
95%
#107
Core Ultra 5 228V
MSRP: $295|Avg: $295
94%
#111
Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-10700K

#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
112%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
111%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
110%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
108%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
108%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
107%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
106%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
106%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
106%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
105%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
105%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
104%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
102%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
101%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
101%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
100%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
96%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
96%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
96%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
96%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
95%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
95%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
92%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
92%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
92%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
92%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
92%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
92%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
91%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
91%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 5 226V leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-10700K is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($300)
⚠️ Higher cost ($380)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core Ultra 5 226V leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 21% cheaper ($300 vs $380) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+26%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($300)
⚠️ Higher cost ($380)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 226V and Core i7-10700K

Intel

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

Intel

Core i7-10700K

The Core i7-10700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,561 points. Launch price was $400.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 5 226V packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i7-10700K's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus 5.1 GHz on the Core i7-10700K — a 12.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-10700K (base: 2.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture (3 nm), while the Core i7-10700K uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 226V scores 18,400 against the Core i7-10700K's 18,561 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i7-10700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 9,041 vs 14,144 (44% advantage for the Core i7-10700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 1,290, a 41.3% lead for the Core Ultra 5 226V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,898 vs 8,404 (126.3% advantage for the Core i7-10700K). L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 226V vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i7-10700K.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.5 GHz
5.1 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+81%
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB (per core)+900%
256K (per core)
Process
3 nm-79%
14 nm
Architecture
Lunar Lake (2024)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
18,400
18,561
Cinebench R23 Multi
9,041
14,144+56%
Geekbench 6 Single
1,962+52%
1,290
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,898
8,404+343%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 5 226V uses the FCBGA2833 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-10700K uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 5 226V versus DDR4-2933 on the Core i7-10700K — the Core Ultra 5 226V supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-10700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Core Ultra 5 226V) vs 16 (Core i7-10700K) — the Core i7-10700K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Core Ultra 5 226V) and Intel 400 Series,Intel 500 Series (Core i7-10700K).

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
Socket
FCBGA2833
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5X-8533+25%
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
128 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-10700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core Ultra 5 226V supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V) vs Yes (Core i7-10700K). Both include integrated graphics Arc 130V (Core Ultra 5 226V) and UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-10700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-10700K targets Gaming/Workstation. Direct competitor: Core i7-10700K rivals Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Arc 130V
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Yes
Target Use
Gaming/Workstation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 226V launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core i7-10700K debuted at $387. At current prices ($300 vs $380), the Core Ultra 5 226V is $80 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 226V delivers 61.3 pts/$ vs 48.8 pts/$ for the Core i7-10700K — making the Core Ultra 5 226V the 22.7% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 5 226VCore i7-10700K
MSRP
$300-22%
$387
Avg Price (30d)
$300-21%
$380
Performance per Dollar
61.3+26%
48.8
Release Date
2024
2020