Core Ultra 5 236V vs Core Ultra 5 226V

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 226V

#82

Core i7-11700B

MSRP: $323|Avg: $311

109%

#83

Core i7-13700HX

MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A

108%

#86

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

107%

#96

Ryzen AI Max PRO 380

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

100%

#97

Core Ultra 5 226V

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

100%

#101

Core i5-1350P

MSRP: $320|Avg: $250

96%

#102

Core i3-1220P

MSRP: $250|Avg: $150

95%

#107

Core Ultra 5 228V

MSRP: $295|Avg: $295

94%

#111

Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $180

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core Ultra 5 236V leads in gaming performance. However, the Core Ultra 5 226V is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.

Insight	Core Ultra 5 236V	Core Ultra 5 226V
Gaming	✅ Superior gaming performance	❌ Lower gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($403)	✅ More affordable ($300)
Longevity	✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)	✨ Modern (Lunar Lake (2024) / 3 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: The Core Ultra 5 226V leads not only in performance but also in value. It is effectively 26% cheaper ($300 vs $403) while identifying as the stronger performer.

Insight	Core Ultra 5 236V	Core Ultra 5 226V
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+35%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($403)	✅ More affordable ($300)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core Ultra 5 236V Benchmark Check

Core Ultra 5 226V Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 236V and Core Ultra 5 226V

Core Ultra 5 236V

The Core Ultra 5 236V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,313 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 5 226V

The Core Ultra 5 226V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,400 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core Ultra 5 236V and Core Ultra 5 226V share an identical 8-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.7 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 236V versus 4.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 226V — a 4.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 236V (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). Both are built on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture using a 3 nm process. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 236V scores 18,313 against the Core Ultra 5 226V's 18,400 — a 0.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 226V. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 236V	Core Ultra 5 226V
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 8
Boost Clock	4.7 GHz+4%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB (per core)	2.5 MB (per core)
Process	3 nm	3 nm
Architecture	Lunar Lake (2024)	Lunar Lake (2024)
PassMark	18,313	18,400
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	9,041
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,898

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the FCBGA2833 socket with PCIe 5.0.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 236V	Core Ultra 5 226V
Socket	FCBGA2833	FCBGA2833
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	LPDDR5X-8533
Max RAM Capacity	—	16 GB
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Core Ultra 5 236V) / VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 226V). The Core Ultra 5 226V includes integrated graphics (Arc 130V), while the Core Ultra 5 236V requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core Ultra 5 236V	Core Ultra 5 226V
Integrated GPU	—	Yes
IGPU Model	—	Arc 130V
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 5 236V launched at $0 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 226V debuted at $300. At current prices ($403 vs $300), the Core Ultra 5 226V is $103 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 236V delivers 45.4 pts/$ vs 61.3 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 226V — making the Core Ultra 5 226V the 29.8% better value option.