Core Ultra 5 245KF vs EPYC 7D12
Core Ultra 5 245KF
EPYC 7D12
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 5 245KF
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7D12
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Rome (2020) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+84%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($189) | ✅ More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 5 245KF and EPYC 7D12
Core Ultra 5 245KF
The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.
EPYC 7D12
The EPYC 7D12 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rome (2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 42,285 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245KF packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the EPYC 7D12 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 7D12 has 18 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 7D12 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245KF (base: 4.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC 7D12 uses Rome (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 43,424 against the EPYC 7D12's 42,285 — a 2.7% lead for the Core Ultra 5 245KF. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7D12.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 32 / 64+129% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+73% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+282% | 1.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Rome (2020) |
| PassMark | 43,424+3% | 42,285 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7D12 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF versus 3200 on the EPYC 7D12 — the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7D12 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) vs 8 (EPYC 7D12). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) vs 128 (EPYC 7D12) — the EPYC 7D12 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) and SP3 (EPYC 7D12).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | 3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 | 4096+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 5 245KF has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 7D12 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245KF) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 7D12). The Core Ultra 5 245KF includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)), while the EPYC 7D12 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X; EPYC 7D12 rivals Xeon Gold 6248.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 5 245KF launched at $294 MSRP, while the EPYC 7D12 debuted at $1000. At current prices ($189 vs $100), the EPYC 7D12 is $89 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245KF delivers 229.8 pts/$ vs 422.9 pts/$ for the EPYC 7D12 — making the EPYC 7D12 the 59.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | EPYC 7D12 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294-71% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $189 | $100-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 229.8 | 422.9+84% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 245KF and EPYC 7D12
