Core Ultra 5 245KF
Ryzen 9 5900XT
Core Ultra 5 245KF vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 5 245KF vs Ryzen 9 5900XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 5 245KF vs Ryzen 9 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 5 245KF
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($294 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 147.7 vs 126.4 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores), while Ryzen 9 5900XT needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (43,424 vs 44,105).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌19% higher power demand at 125W vs 105W.
Ryzen 9 5900XT
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
- ✅Draws 105W instead of 125W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 245KF across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 126.4 vs 147.7 PassMark/$ ($349 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 5 245KF moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 5 245KF can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 245KF better than Ryzen 9 5900XT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 5 245KF vs Ryzen 9 5900XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 5 245KF
The Core Ultra 5 245KF is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 14 cores and 14 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 43,424 points. Launch price was $294.
Ryzen 9 5900XT
The Ryzen 9 5900XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 44,105 points. Launch price was $349.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 5 245KF packs 14 cores / 14 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900XT has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.2 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 245KF versus 4.8 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — a 8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 5 245KF (base: 4.2 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 5 245KF scores 43,424 against the Ryzen 9 5900XT's 44,105 — a 1.6% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900XT. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 245KF vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900XT.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 14 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.2 GHz+8% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.2 GHz+27% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB+167% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 43,424 | 44,105+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 22,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,320 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 14,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 5 245KF uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 5 245KF versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 9 5900XT — the Core Ultra 5 245KF supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 245KF supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 5900XT) — the Ryzen 9 5900XT offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 5 245KF) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 5900XT).
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+50% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 5 245KF) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900XT). The Core Ultra 5 245KF includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores)), while the Ryzen 9 5900XT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900XT targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 245KF rivals Ryzen 5 9600X.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (4 Xe-cores) | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 5 245KF was priced at $294, while the Ryzen 9 5900XT came in at $349. On launch pricing ($294 vs $349), Core Ultra 5 245KF was $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 5 245KF delivers 147.7 pts/$ vs 126.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900XT — making the Core Ultra 5 245KF the 15.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 5 245KF | Ryzen 9 5900XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $294-16% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 147.7+17% | 126.4 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 5 245KF and Ryzen 9 5900XT
