Core Ultra 7 265 vs EPYC Embedded 8224P
Core Ultra 7 265
EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265
Performance Per Dollar EPYC Embedded 8224P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Siena (2023−2024) / 5 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+233%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($320) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,048) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC Embedded 8224P
Core Ultra 7 265
The Core Ultra 7 265 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 49,666 points. Launch price was $394.
EPYC Embedded 8224P
The EPYC Embedded 8224P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.55 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 48,869 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265 packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC Embedded 8224P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 3 GHz on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — a 55.4% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.55 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265 scores 49,666 against the EPYC Embedded 8224P's 48,869 — a 1.6% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265 vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC Embedded 8224P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20 | 24 / 48+20% |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+77% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.55 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+200% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-40% | 5 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 49,666+2% | 48,869 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265 uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265 versus 4800 on the EPYC Embedded 8224P — the Core Ultra 7 265 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC Embedded 8224P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 256 — 127.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265) vs 96 (EPYC Embedded 8224P) — the EPYC Embedded 8224P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265) and SP6 (EPYC Embedded 8224P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | SP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 6400+33% | 4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 | 1152+350% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC Embedded 8224P). The Core Ultra 7 265 includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics), while the EPYC Embedded 8224P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 265 rivals Ryzen 7 9700X; EPYC Embedded 8224P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265 launched at $384 MSRP, while the EPYC Embedded 8224P debuted at $855. At current prices ($320 vs $1048), the Core Ultra 7 265 is $728 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265 delivers 155.2 pts/$ vs 46.6 pts/$ for the EPYC Embedded 8224P — making the Core Ultra 7 265 the 107.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265 | EPYC Embedded 8224P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-55% | $855 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $320-69% | $1048 |
| Performance per Dollar | 155.2+233% | 46.6 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265 and EPYC Embedded 8224P
