Core Ultra 7 265T vs M3 Max 16-Core
Core Ultra 7 265T
M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Per Dollar M3 Max 16-Core
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($362) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Legacy / 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($362) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265T and M3 Max 16-Core
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
M3 Max 16-Core
The M3 Max 16-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5, LPDDR5X. Passmark benchmark score: 41,257 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265T packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the M3 Max 16-Core offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Max 16-Core — a 26.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265T is built on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265T scores 40,681 against the M3 Max 16-Core's 41,257 — a 1.4% lead for the M3 Max 16-Core.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+25% | 16 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+31% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.748 GHz+83% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | — |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | — |
| Process | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | — |
| PassMark | 40,681 | 41,257+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,954 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,455 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the M3 Max 16-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 6400 on the M3 Max 16-Core — the M3 Max 16-Core supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 7 265T supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 4 (M3 Max 16-Core). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 0 (M3 Max 16-Core) — the Core Ultra 7 265T offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T) and Apple M3 (M3 Max 16-Core).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+157286300% | 128 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs VT-x, VT-d (macOS) (M3 Max 16-Core). Both include integrated graphics — Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) (Core Ultra 7 265T) and Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) (M3 Max 16-Core) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: M3 Max 16-Core rivals Core i9-13950HX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | M3 Max 16-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) | Apple M3 Max GPU (40-core) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d (macOS) |
| Target Use | High End Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265T and M3 Max 16-Core
