Core Ultra 7 265T vs Xeon 6515P
Core Ultra 7 265T
Xeon 6515P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6515P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($886) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+145%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($886) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265T and Xeon 6515P
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
Xeon 6515P
The Xeon 6515P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 40,720 points. Launch price was $740.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265T packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon 6515P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265T has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6515P — a 33% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon 6515P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265T scores 40,681 against the Xeon 6515P's 40,720 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon 6515P. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265T vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6515P.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+25% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+39% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 2.3 GHz+53% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+140% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+50% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 40,681 | 40,720 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,954 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,455 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon 6515P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 6400 on the Xeon 6515P — the Xeon 6515P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6515P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 8 (Xeon 6515P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 88 (Xeon 6515P) — the Xeon 6515P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6515P).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+4915100% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core Ultra 7 265T has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6515P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core Ultra 7 265T includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core)), while the Xeon 6515P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Xeon 6515P rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | High End Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265T launched at $384 MSRP, while the Xeon 6515P debuted at $740. At current prices ($362 vs $886), the Core Ultra 7 265T is $524 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265T delivers 112.4 pts/$ vs 46.0 pts/$ for the Xeon 6515P — making the Core Ultra 7 265T the 83.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Xeon 6515P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-48% | $740 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $362-59% | $886 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.4+144% | 46.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265T and Xeon 6515P
