Core Ultra 7 265T vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Core Ultra 7 265T
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 7 265T
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+180%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($362) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,000) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 7 265T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
Core Ultra 7 265T
The Core Ultra 7 265T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 20 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 40,681 points. Launch price was $384.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 40,126 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 7 265T packs 20 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core Ultra 7 265T has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.3 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — a 16.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 7 265T (base: 1.5 GHz vs 4.1 GHz). The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 7 265T scores 40,681 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX's 40,126 — a 1.4% lead for the Core Ultra 7 265T. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 265T vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 20 / 20+67% | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 5.3 GHz+18% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.5 GHz | 4.1 GHz+173% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total) | 64 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 40,681+1% | 40,126 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 34,000 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,954 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,455 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 7 265T uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 7 265T versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890,H870,B860 (Core Ultra 7 265T) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB+9830300% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core Ultra 7 265T) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX). The Core Ultra 7 265T includes integrated graphics (Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core)), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core Ultra 7 265T targets High End Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX rivals Xeon W-3335.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Graphics (Xe-LPG 4-core) | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | High End Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 7 265T launched at $384 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX debuted at $2399. At current prices ($362 vs $1000), the Core Ultra 7 265T is $638 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 7 265T delivers 112.4 pts/$ vs 40.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX — making the Core Ultra 7 265T the 94.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 7 265T | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $384-84% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $362-64% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.4+180% | 40.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 7 265T and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX
