Core Ultra 9 285K
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core Ultra 9 285K
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.3% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅Costs $1,810 less on MSRP ($589 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 312.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.6 vs 27.8 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $2,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 125W instead of 280W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of sWRX8 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (45,000 vs 45,563).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.8 vs 114.6 PassMark/$ ($2,399 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- ❌124% higher power demand at 280W vs 125W.
- ❌Older platform position on sWRX8 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 9 285K moves to LGA1851 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 285K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285K better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 67,482 points. Launch price was $589.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285K packs 24 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 21.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 67,482 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 45,563 vs 45,000 (1.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,550, a 69.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,563 vs 15,500 (37.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285K vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+24% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+16967% |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 67,482+1% | 66,614 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,563+1% | 45,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+106% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,563+46% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the Core Ultra 9 285K supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890 (Core Ultra 9 285K) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+100% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). The Core Ultra 9 285K includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285K rivals Ryzen 9 9950X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 64EU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core Ultra 9 285K was priced at $589, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX came in at $2399. On launch pricing ($589 vs $2399), Core Ultra 9 285K was $1810 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285K delivers 114.6 pts/$ vs 27.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Core Ultra 9 285K the 122% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589-75% | $2399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 114.6+312% | 27.8 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
