Core Ultra 9 285K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Core Ultra 9 285K
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285K
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Chagall PRO (2022) / 7 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+141%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($550) | ✅ More affordable ($225) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
Core Ultra 9 285K
The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 67,482 points. Launch price was $589.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2022-03-08. It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 66,614 points. Launch price was $2,399.
Processing Power
The Core Ultra 9 285K packs 24 cores / 24 threads, matching the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 24 cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — a 21.8% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 67,482 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX's 66,614 — a 1.3% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 45,563 vs 45,000 (1.2% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,550, a 69.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,563 vs 15,500 (37.1% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285K vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 24 | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+24% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz | 3.8 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 128 MB+256% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB (per core)+500% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 3 nm-57% | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 67,482+1% | 66,614 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 45,563+1% | 45,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 3,200+106% | 1,550 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 22,563+46% | 15,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285K versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — the Core Ultra 9 285K supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 165.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890 (Core Ultra 9 285K) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX).
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1851 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400+25% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 2048 GB+967% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX). The Core Ultra 9 285K includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285K rivals Ryzen 9 9950X; Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX rivals Xeon Gold 6430.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel Arc Graphics 64EU | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | true | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Core Ultra 9 285K launched at $589 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX debuted at $2399. At current prices ($550 vs $225), the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is $325 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285K delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 296.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX — making the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX the 82.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $589-75% | $2399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550 | $225-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 122.7 | 296.1+141% |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
