Core Ultra 9 285K
VS
Xeon Platinum 8571N

Core Ultra 9 285K vs Xeon Platinum 8571N

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

24 Cores24 Thrd125 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024
VS
Intel

Xeon Platinum 8571N

52 Cores104 Thrd300 WWMax: 4 GHz2023

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core Ultra 9 285K

#109
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
104%
#110
Ryzen 5 4600GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $125
104%
#111
Core i5-10500T
MSRP: $226|Avg: $80
103%
#112
Core i5-14600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
103%
#113
Core i7-14700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $330
102%
#114
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP: $89|Avg: $52
102%
#115
Core i9-14900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $469
102%
#116
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
101%
#117
Core i7-13790F
MSRP: $392|Avg: $350
101%
#118
Core i5-14500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $251
101%
#119
Core i5-11600KF
MSRP: $237|Avg: $157
101%
#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
101%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
101%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
100%
#123
Ryzen 5 5600G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
100%
#124
Core Ultra 9 285K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $550
100%
#125
Core i5-13400E
MSRP: $221|Avg: $221
100%
#126
Ryzen 7 8700F
MSRP: $270|Avg: $257
99%
#127
Core i9-14900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $480
99%
#128
Core i7-12700K
MSRP: $409|Avg: $285
98%
#129
Core i9-13900KF
MSRP: $599|Avg: $480
98%
#130
Core i7-12700
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
98%
#131
Core Ultra 5 245T
MSRP: $270|Avg: $270
98%
#132
Core i5-8500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $80
97%
#133
Core i5-9400F
MSRP: $182|Avg: $80
96%
#134
Core i5-11400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $141
96%
#135
Core i5-13600K
MSRP: $329|Avg: $319
96%
#136
Core i5-13500
MSRP: $242|Avg: $264
96%
#137
Ryzen 7 8700G
MSRP: $329|Avg: $269
96%
#138
Core i7-14700
MSRP: $384|Avg: $348
96%
#139
Ryzen 5 2500X
MSRP: $159|Avg: $80
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon Platinum 8571N

#50
Xeon Gold 6238R
MSRP: $2612|Avg: N/A
128%
#54
EPYC 4465P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
110%
#55
Ryzen 5 PRO 7645
MSRP: $229|Avg: $192
105%
#56
Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP: $128|Avg: $128
105%
#59
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
MSRP: $409|Avg: $450
100%
#60
Xeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP: $599|Avg: $418
100%
#61
Xeon Platinum 8270
MSRP: $7405|Avg: N/A
100%
#62
EPYC 4464P
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
96%
#63
EPYC 4345P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
96%
#64
EPYC 4344P
MSRP: $329|Avg: $314
94%
#65
EPYC 4364P
MSRP: $399|Avg: $334
89%
#66
EPYC 4585PX
MSRP: $699|Avg: $826
88%
#67
EPYC 4545P
MSRP: $549|Avg: $595
87%
#71
Ryzen 7 PRO 7745
MSRP: $400|Avg: $343
76%
#73
EPYC 4484PX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $599
74%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($418) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon Platinum 8571N is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($550)
More affordable ($418)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) / 3 nm)
✨ Modern (Emerald Rapids (2023) / Intel 7 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Ultra 9 285K ($550), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($132 less, 32% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+33%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($550)
More affordable ($418)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core Ultra 9 285K and Xeon Platinum 8571N

Intel

Core Ultra 9 285K

The Core Ultra 9 285K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 67,482 points. Launch price was $589.

Intel

Xeon Platinum 8571N

The Xeon Platinum 8571N is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Emerald Rapids (2023) architecture. It features 52 cores and 104 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 300 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5 @ 4800 MT/s (1 DPC). Passmark benchmark score: 68,385 points. Launch price was $6,839.

Processing Power

The Core Ultra 9 285K packs 24 cores / 24 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 52 cores / 104 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8571N has 28 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285K versus 4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8571N — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture (3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses Emerald Rapids (2023) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core Ultra 9 285K scores 67,482 against the Xeon Platinum 8571N's 68,385 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8571N. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 3,200 vs 1,961, a 48% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 22,563 vs 60,000 (90.7% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8571N). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285K vs 300 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8571N.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
Cores / Threads
24 / 24
52 / 104+117%
Boost Clock
5.6 GHz+40%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+54%
2.4 GHz
L3 Cache
36 MB (total)
300 MB (total)+733%
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)+50%
2 MB (per core)
Process
3 nm-57%
Intel 7 nm
Architecture
Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Emerald Rapids (2023)
PassMark
67,482
68,385+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi
45,563
Geekbench 6 Single
3,200+63%
1,961
Geekbench 6 Multi
22,563
60,000+166%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core Ultra 9 285K uses the LGA1851 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-6400 memory speed. The Xeon Platinum 8571N supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB 182.1% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 8 (Xeon Platinum 8571N). PCIe lanes: 24 (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs 80 (Xeon Platinum 8571N) — the Xeon Platinum 8571N offers 56 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Z890 (Core Ultra 9 285K) and C741 (Xeon Platinum 8571N).

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
Socket
LGA1851
LGA4677
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0
PCIe 5.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-6400
DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
192 GB
4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
80+233%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core Ultra 9 285K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon Platinum 8571N supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Core Ultra 9 285K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Platinum 8571N). The Core Ultra 9 285K includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc Graphics 64EU), while the Xeon Platinum 8571N requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Platinum 8571N targets Cloud Server. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 9 285K rivals Ryzen 9 9950X; Xeon Platinum 8571N rivals EPYC 9454.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel Arc Graphics 64EU
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
Yes
Virtualization
true
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Cloud Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Core Ultra 9 285K launched at $589 MSRP, while the Xeon Platinum 8571N debuted at $599. At current prices ($550 vs $418), the Xeon Platinum 8571N is $132 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core Ultra 9 285K delivers 122.7 pts/$ vs 163.6 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8571N — making the Xeon Platinum 8571N the 28.6% better value option.

FeatureCore Ultra 9 285KXeon Platinum 8571N
MSRP
$589-2%
$599
Avg Price (30d)
$550
$418-24%
Performance per Dollar
122.7
163.6+33%
Release Date
2024
2023