E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores2 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2003

Performance Spectrum - CPU

E-240

1 / 1

338

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 / 2

345

+2.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is on rank 271, so the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

4340%

#1158

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

4277%

#1159

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3926%

#1160

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3908%

#1161

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3872%

#1163

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

3740%

#1164

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

3586%

#1165

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

3580%

#1166

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

3484%

#1169

E-240

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1170

Celeron 1047UE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

100%

#1171

Core M-5Y70

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1172

Celeron U3400

MSRP: $86|Avg: $5

99%

#1173

Celeron T1600

MSRP: $107|Avg: $15

99%

#1174

Pro A12-8800B

MSRP: $400|Avg: $40

99%

#1176

Core i7-2637M

MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A

97%

#1177

Athlon PRO 3045B

MSRP: $426|Avg: $180

96%

#1178

Core 2 Duo SL9600

MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A

96%

#1179

Core 2 Duo T5600

MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A

96%

#1180

Pentium N3510

MSRP: $161|Avg: $161

96%

#1181

Core i7-7Y75

MSRP: $393|Avg: $285

95%

#1183

Core i7-4500U

MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

#257

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

425%

#258

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

419%

#259

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

385%

#260

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

383%

#261

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

379%

#263

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

366%

#264

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

351%

#265

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

351%

#266

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

341%

#271

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#275

Core 2 Extreme X9100

MSRP: $851|Avg: N/A

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E-240 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	E-240	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Northwood (2002−2004) / 130 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 (2003) relies on 130 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	E-240	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	Equivalent pricing	Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

E-240 Benchmark Check

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 345 — a 2% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	E-240	Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
Cores / Threads	1 / 1	1 / 2
Boost Clock	1.5 GHz	2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	512 kB
Process	40 nm-69%	130 nm
Architecture	Zacate (2011−2013)	Northwood (2002−2004)
PassMark	338	345+2%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.