Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
Intel

Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores2 Thrd60 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2003
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Performance Spectrum

E-240
1 / 1
338
0.0%
brand logoAthlon XP 1500+
brand logoAthlon XP 1800+
brand logoAthlon XP 2000+
brand logoAthlon XP 2200+
brand logoRyzen 5 5600G
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
1 / 2
345
+2.1%
brand logoAtom Z510
brand logoPentium III 1400S
brand logoAtom N270
brand logoCeleron 2.20
brand logoCore Ultra 7 268V
brand logoXeon W-3335
brand logoXeon w7-3545
brand logoXeon w9-3575X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
E-240
low8 FPS
medium8 FPS
high8 FPS
ultra8 FPS
1080P
Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
low9 FPS
medium9 FPS
high9 FPS
ultra9 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

E-240

2011

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (338 vs 345).
    • ❌753.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 60W.

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

    2003

    Why buy it

    • ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ✅Draws 60W instead of 512W, a 452W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 better than E-240?
    Yes. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 12.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 1 cores and 2 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 still makes the most sense overall. Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    E-240 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2003). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    E-240 vs Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    E-240

    The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

    Intel

    Mobile Pentium 4 2.40

    The Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2003 (22 years ago). It is based on the Northwood (2002−2004) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 345 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚡

    Processing Power

    The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, matching the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 1 cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 2.4 GHz on the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses Northwood (2002−2004) (130 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40's 345 — a 2% lead for the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

    FeatureE-240Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
    Cores / Threads
    1 / 1
    1 / 2
    Boost Clock
    1.5 GHz
    2.4 GHz+60%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    0 kB
    L2 Cache
    512 kB
    512 kB
    Process
    40 nm-69%
    130 nm
    Architecture
    Zacate (2011−2013)
    Northwood (2002−2004)
    PassMark
    338
    345+2%
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Mobile Pentium 4 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureE-240Mobile Pentium 4 2.40
    Socket
    FT1
    PGA478
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0+82%
    PCIe 1.1