GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon 3000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon 3000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon 3000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

✅210.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon 3000

2019

Why buy it

✅GeForce 240M GT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3000 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 240M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 240M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 210.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 226.5% in PassMark G3D (320 vs 98), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3000 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2015. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 240M GT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 3000 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon 3000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

Radeon 3000

The Radeon 3000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 98 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 240M GT scores 320 versus the Radeon 3000's 98 — the GeForce 240M GT leads by 226.5%. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon 3000 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 512 (Radeon 3000). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3000). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1218 MHz.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
G3D Mark Score	320+227%	98
Architecture	Maxwell	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	384	512+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9032 TFLOPS	1.247 TFLOPS+38%
Boost Clock	1176 MHz	1218 MHz+4%
ROPs	8	16+100%
TMUs	24	32+33%
L1 Cache	192 KB+50%	128 KB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon 3000. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon 3000) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 10_0 (Radeon 3000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
DirectX	10.1	10_0
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs Avivo HD (Radeon 3000). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Avivo HD.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
Encoder	None	Avivo HD
Decoder	PureVideo VP4	Avivo HD
Codecs	MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon 3000's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (Radeon 3000). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
TDP	33W-34%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	1mm
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.7+385%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon 3000 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon 3000 was 100+% cheaper ($100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs Infinity (Radeon 3000) — the Radeon 3000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3000 (2019 vs 2015).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon 3000
MSRP	$100	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	3.2	Infinity
Codename	GM108	Polaris 23
Release	March 13 2015	May 13 2019
Ranking	#847	#757

Search GeForce 240M GT on Amazon

Search Radeon 3000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.