Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 240M GT

CPUCPUGPUGPU

FirePro V3800

2010Core: 690 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 240M GT Performance Spectrum

FirePro V3800
4 GB 74
321
+0.3%
brand logoRadeon HD 6230
brand logoMobility Radeon. HD 5470
brand logoRadeon HD 4650
brand logoMobility Radeon HD 5165
brand logoRadeon RX 5300M
brand logoRadeon RX 6550M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6700 XT
GeForce 240M GT
0.5 GB 33
320
0.0%
brand logoGeForce 8600 GS
brand logoGeForce GT 240M
brand logoGeForce 7800 GT
brand logoGeForce GT 520M
brand logoGeForce GTX 1050
brand logoGeForce GTX 1060 3GB
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 Ti
brand logoGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 240M GT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3800

2010

Why buy it

  • ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • ❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • ❌124.2% higher power demand at 74W vs 33W.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 33W instead of 74W, a 41W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
FirePro V3800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (321 vs 320), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
FirePro V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 28.6% (3.2 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce 240M GT is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V3800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V3800 vs GeForce 240M GT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the GeForce 240M GT reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the GeForce 240M GT uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 384 (GeForce 240M GT). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT).

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
G3D Mark Score
321
320
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Maxwell
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
800+108%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.104 TFLOPS+22%
0.9032 TFLOPS
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
40+67%
24
L1 Cache
80 KB
192 KB+140%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The FirePro V3800 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 240M GT carries 512 MB. FirePro V3800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (FirePro V3800) vs 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
VRAM Capacity
4 GB+700%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
1 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V3800) vs 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
DirectX
11.2+11%
10.1
OpenGL
4.4+33%
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (FirePro V3800) vs None (GeForce 240M GT). Decoder: UVD 2.3 vs PureVideo VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800) vs MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT).

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
Encoder
None
None
Decoder
UVD 2.3
PureVideo VP4
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the GeForce 240M GT's 33W — a 76.6% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 350W (GeForce 240M GT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 80°C.

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
TDP
74W
33W-55%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
0mm
Height
69mm
0mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80
80°C
Perf/Watt
4.3
9.7+126%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the GeForce 240M GT launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce 240M GT was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 28% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureFirePro V3800GeForce 240M GT
MSRP
$129
$100-22%
Performance per Dollar
2.5
3.2+28%
Codename
Juniper
GM108
Release
April 26 2010
March 13 2015
Ranking
#780
#847
Search FirePro V3800 on AmazonSearch GeForce 240M GT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.