FirePro V3800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3800

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 17.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌48% higher power demand at 74W vs 50W.

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 74W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.3% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.1 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V3800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (321 vs 318), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V3800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 17.4% (2.5 vs 2.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

FirePro V3800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 560v Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

Mobility Radeon HD 560v

The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 318 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the Mobility Radeon HD 560v reaches 318 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 560v).

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
G3D Mark Score	321	318
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	800
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS	1.12 TFLOPS+1%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40	40
L1 Cache	80 KB	80 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v carries 1 GB. FirePro V3800 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and 128-bit on the Mobility Radeon HD 560v.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+300%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (FirePro V3800) vs 10.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
DirectX	11.2+11%	10.1
OpenGL	4.4+33%	3.3
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 560v's 50W — a 38.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 560v is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 560v). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75°C.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
TDP	74W	50W-32%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	4.3	6.4+49%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the Mobility Radeon HD 560v launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro V3800 was 14% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs 2.1 (Mobility Radeon HD 560v) — the FirePro V3800 offers 19% better value.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Mobility Radeon HD 560v
MSRP	$129-14%	$150
Performance per Dollar	2.5+19%	2.1
Codename	Juniper	Broadway
Release	April 26 2010	January 7 2010
Ranking	#780	#846

Search FirePro V3800 on Amazon

Search Mobility Radeon HD 560v on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.