FirePro V3800 vs RADEON HD6370D

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3800 vs RADEON HD6370D FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3800 vs RADEON HD6370D: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3800

2010

Why buy it

✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 74W instead of 250W, a 176W reduction.
✅More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
158% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 6.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

RADEON HD6370D

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 157.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.4 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌237.8% higher power demand at 250W vs 74W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro V3800 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (321 vs 320), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON HD6370D makes the most sense to buy today. It is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 157.2% (6.4 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON HD6370D is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, FirePro V3800 has the stronger long-term case.

FirePro V3800 vs RADEON HD6370D Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

RADEON HD6370D

The RADEON HD6370D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 14 2010. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The boost clock speed is 880 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points. Launch price was $369.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the RADEON HD6370D reaches 320 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the RADEON HD6370D uses TeraScale 3, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 1,536 (RADEON HD6370D). Raw compute: 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800) vs 2.703 TFLOPS (RADEON HD6370D).

Feature	FirePro V3800	RADEON HD6370D
G3D Mark Score	321	320
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 3
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800	1536+92%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.104 TFLOPS	2.703 TFLOPS+145%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	40	96+140%
L1 Cache	80 KB	192 KB+140%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3800	RADEON HD6370D
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the RADEON HD6370D carries 512 MB. FirePro V3800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and 128-bit on the RADEON HD6370D. L2 Cache: 256 KB (FirePro V3800) vs 512 KB (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	FirePro V3800	RADEON HD6370D
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the RADEON HD6370D's 250W — a 108.6% difference. The FirePro V3800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 350W (RADEON HD6370D). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	FirePro V3800	RADEON HD6370D
TDP	74W-70%	250W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	4.3+231%	1.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the RADEON HD6370D launched at $50. On MSRP, RADEON HD6370D was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs 6.4 (RADEON HD6370D) — the RADEON HD6370D offers 156% better value.

Feature	FirePro V3800	RADEON HD6370D
MSRP	$129	$50-61%
Performance per Dollar	2.5	6.4+156%
Codename	Juniper	Cayman
Release	April 26 2010	December 14 2010
Ranking	#780	#596

Search FirePro V3800 on Amazon

Search RADEON HD6370D on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.