FirePro V3800 vs Radeon E6460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

FirePro V3800 vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FirePro V3800 vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

FirePro V3800

2010

Why buy it

✅Costs $21 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.5 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2010 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌64.4% higher power demand at 74W vs 45W.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 74W, a 29W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
16.3% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon E6460 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (324 vs 321), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

FirePro V3800 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro V3800 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $21 cheaper on MSRP at $129 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 15.2% (2.5 vs 2.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon E6460 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

FirePro V3800 vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The FirePro V3800 scores 321 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The FirePro V3800 is built on TeraScale 2 while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 800 (FirePro V3800) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

Feature	FirePro V3800	Radeon E6460
G3D Mark Score	321	324
Architecture	TeraScale 2	TeraScale 2
Process Node	40 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	800+67%	480
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	40+67%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	FirePro V3800	Radeon E6460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The FirePro V3800 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon E6460 carries 512 MB. FirePro V3800 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the FirePro V3800 and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Radeon E6460
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+700%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The FirePro V3800 draws 74W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 48.7% difference. The Radeon E6460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (FirePro V3800) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.

Feature	FirePro V3800	Radeon E6460
TDP	74W	45W-39%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	168mm	—
Height	69mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80	—
Perf/Watt	4.3	7.2+67%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FirePro V3800 came in at $129, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, FirePro V3800 was 14% cheaper ($21 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.5 (FirePro V3800) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the FirePro V3800 offers 13.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon E6460 (2011 vs 2010).

Feature	FirePro V3800	Radeon E6460
MSRP	$129-14%	$150
Performance per Dollar	2.5+14%	2.2
Codename	Juniper	Turks
Release	April 26 2010	May 2 2011
Ranking	#780	#923

Search FirePro V3800 on Amazon

Search Radeon E6460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.