GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9600 GSO

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GSO

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9600 GSO Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9600 GSO FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9600 GSO: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $29 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.5 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 150W, a 117W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 9600 GSO across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce 9600 GSO

2008

Why buy it

  • 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 29% HIGHER MSRP
    $129 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.5 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 354.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9600 GSO is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (323 vs 320), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 240M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 65nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $29 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 27.8% (3.2 vs 2.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce 9600 GSO still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce 9600 GSO Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9600 GSO

The GeForce 9600 GSO is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the GeForce 9600 GSO reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce 9600 GSO uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 224 (GeForce 9600 GSO).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
G3D Mark Score
320
323
Architecture
Maxwell
G9x
Process Node
28 nm
65 nm
Shading Units
384+71%
224

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 240M GT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9600 GSO carries 2 GB. GeForce 9600 GSO gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce 9600 GSO.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1.5 GB+200%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce 9600 GSO). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs No (GeForce 9600 GSO). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce 9600 GSO).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce 9600 GSO's 150W — a 127.9% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (GeForce 9600 GSO). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 90°C.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
TDP
33W-78%
150W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
0mm
229mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-11%
90°C
Perf/Watt
9.7+341%
2.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the GeForce 9600 GSO launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce 240M GT was 22.5% cheaper ($29 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2.5 (GeForce 9600 GSO) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 28% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce 9600 GSO
MSRP
$100-22%
$129
Performance per Dollar
3.2+28%
2.5
Codename
GM108
NB9E-GTX
Release
March 13 2015
July 15 2008
Ranking
#847
#825

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.