GeForce 240M GT
Radeon HD 7520G
GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7520G Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7520G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7520G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 240M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 33W instead of 200W, a 167W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7520G across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.7% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$60 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
Radeon HD 7520G
2012Why buy it
- ✅14.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $40 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($60 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌506.1% higher power demand at 200W vs 33W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7520G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.
Radeon HD 7520G
The Radeon HD 7520G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 315 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Radeon HD 7520G reaches 315 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 7520G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7520G). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7520G). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320+2% | 315 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1792+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 2.867 TFLOPS+217% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1250 MHz+6% |
| ROPs | 8 | 32+300% |
| TMUs | 24 | 112+367% |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB | 448 KB+133% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7520G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7520G. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7520G) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 11.2 (Radeon HD 7520G). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 11.2+11% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs UVD 3 (Radeon HD 7520G). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs UVD 3.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | UVD 3 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | UVD 3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7520G's 200W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7520G). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W-84% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7+506% | 1.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 7520G launched at $60. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7520G was 40% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 5.3 (Radeon HD 7520G) — the Radeon HD 7520G offers 65.6% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | Radeon HD 7520G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $60-40% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 5.3+66% |
| Codename | GM108 | Tahiti |
| Release | March 13 2015 | January 31 2012 |
| Ranking | #847 | #454 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce 240M GT and Radeon HD 7520G
