GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

2013Core: 720 / 775 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $40 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • Delivers 36.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $140 MSRP).
  • Draws 33W instead of 50W, a 17W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

2013

Why buy it

  • 12.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 40% HIGHER MSRP
    $140 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.4 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($140 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 51.5% higher power demand at 50W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 12.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (329 vs 320), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 240M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $40 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $140, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 36.2% (3.2 vs 2.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

AMD

Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual

The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 329 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual reaches 329 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 768 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTRadeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
G3D Mark Score
320
329+3%
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
768+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTRadeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTRadeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual's 50W — a 41% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual). Power connectors: Legacy vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTRadeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
TDP
33W-34%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
9.7+47%
6.6
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual launched at $140. On MSRP, GeForce 240M GT was 28.6% cheaper ($40 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2.4 (Radeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 33.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTRadeon HD 7600G + HD 7400M Dual
MSRP
$100-29%
$140
Performance per Dollar
3.2+33%
2.4
Codename
GM108
Release
March 13 2015
August 1 2013
Ranking
#847
#881

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.