
GeForce 240M GT

GeForce GT 230
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 240M GT
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌127.3% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$44 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $44 MSRP).
GeForce GT 230
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($44 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 129.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($44 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 240M GT
The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

GeForce GT 230
The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the GeForce GT 230 reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 230 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 320 | 323 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.9032 TFLOPS | 1.127 TFLOPS+25% |
| Boost Clock | 1176 MHz | 1468 MHz+25% |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 192 KB+33% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 230) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 230). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs No (GeForce GT 230). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 230).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 230's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 33W | 30W-9% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 168mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 9.7 | 10.8+11% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the GeForce GT 230 launched at $44. On MSRP, GeForce GT 230 was 56% cheaper ($56 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 128.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 230 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce 240M GT | GeForce GT 230 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $44-56% |
| Performance per Dollar | 3.2 | 7.3+128% |
| Codename | GM108 | GP108 |
| Release | March 13 2015 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #847 | #641 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














