GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 127.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $100 MSRPvs$44 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 7.3 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $44 MSRP).

GeForce GT 230

2017

Why buy it

  • Costs $56 less on MSRP ($44 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • Delivers 129.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.3 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($44 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GT 230 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.9% in PassMark G3D (323 vs 320), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 240M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 230 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $56 cheaper on MSRP at $44 vs $100, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 129.4% (7.3 vs 3.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 230 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce 240M GT has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce 240M GT vs GeForce GT 230 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 230

The GeForce GT 230 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 323 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the GeForce GT 230 reaches 323 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GT 230 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 384 (GeForce GT 230). Raw compute: 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 240M GT) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 230). Boost clocks: 1176 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
G3D Mark Score
320
323
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.9032 TFLOPS
1.127 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock
1176 MHz
1468 MHz+25%
ROPs
8
16+100%
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
192 KB+33%
144 KB
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the GeForce GT 230. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce 240M GT) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 230) — the GeForce 240M GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 10.0 (GeForce GT 230). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
DirectX
10.1
10.0
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce 240M GT) vs No (GeForce GT 230). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 (GeForce 240M GT) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce GT 230).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo VP4
PureVideo HD VP3
Codecs
MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the GeForce GT 230's 30W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 230 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (GeForce GT 230). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
TDP
33W
30W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
168mm
Height
0mm
111mm
Slots
1
1
Temp (Load)
80°C
75°C-6%
Perf/Watt
9.7
10.8+11%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the GeForce GT 230 launched at $44. On MSRP, GeForce GT 230 was 56% cheaper ($56 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 7.3 (GeForce GT 230) — the GeForce GT 230 offers 128.1% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GT 230 (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce 240M GTGeForce GT 230
MSRP
$100
$44-56%
Performance per Dollar
3.2
7.3+128%
Codename
GM108
GP108
Release
March 13 2015
May 17 2017
Ranking
#847
#641

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.