GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon E6460

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon E6460 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon E6460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 240M GT

2015

Why buy it

✅2.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Delivers 48.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.2 vs 2.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
✅Draws 33W instead of 45W, a 12W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon E6460

2011

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 240M GT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$150 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.2 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌36.4% higher power demand at 45W vs 33W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 240M GT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 2.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon E6460 instead at 324 vs 320, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 240M GT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 240M GT makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $100 vs $150, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 48.1% (3.2 vs 2.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce 240M GT vs Radeon E6460 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 240M GT

The GeForce 240M GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 320 points.

Radeon E6460

The Radeon E6460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 2 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 600 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 324 points. Launch price was $239.99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 240M GT scores 320 and the Radeon E6460 reaches 324 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 240M GT is built on Maxwell while the Radeon E6460 uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 480 (Radeon E6460).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon E6460
G3D Mark Score	320	324+1%
Architecture	Maxwell	TeraScale 2
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	384	480+25%
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce 240M GT gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon E6460 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon E6460
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 240M GT and 64-bit on the Radeon E6460.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon E6460
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 240M GT draws 33W versus the Radeon E6460's 45W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce 240M GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 240M GT) vs 350W (Radeon E6460). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon E6460
TDP	33W-27%	45W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.7+35%	7.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce 240M GT came in at $100, while the Radeon E6460 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce 240M GT was 33.3% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 3.2 (GeForce 240M GT) vs 2.2 (Radeon E6460) — the GeForce 240M GT offers 45.5% better value. The newer card here is GeForce 240M GT (2015 vs 2011).

Feature	GeForce 240M GT	Radeon E6460
MSRP	$100-33%	$150
Performance per Dollar	3.2+45%	2.2
Codename	GM108	Turks
Release	March 13 2015	May 2 2011
Ranking	#847	#923

Search GeForce 240M GT on Amazon

Search Radeon E6460 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.