E-240
VS
Pentium 4 2.40

E-240 vs Pentium 4 2.40

AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Pentium 4 2.40

1 Cores1 Thrd110 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2004

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The E-240 is positioned at rank 1169 and the Pentium 4 2.40 is on rank 1108, so the Pentium 4 2.40 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 4 2.40

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
185545%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
175321%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
127298%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
38349%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
30377%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
26574%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
15220%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
15021%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
13677%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
13676%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
13523%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
13158%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
12974%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
12922%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
12805%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
100%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
94%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
88%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
86%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
83%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
75%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
74%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
74%
#1116
Athlon 64 3400+
MSRP: $440|Avg: $20
74%
#1117
Pentium 4 2.26
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
73%
#1118
Athlon 64 3200+
MSRP: $417|Avg: $10
72%
#1119
Athlon 64 FX-60
MSRP: $1031|Avg: $1000
70%
#1120
Pentium Extreme Edition 965
MSRP: $999|Avg: $100
70%
#1121
Athlon XP 2200+
MSRP: $241|Avg: $30
69%
#1122
Athlon XP 1700+
MSRP: $190|Avg: $15
67%
#1123
Pentium Extreme Edition 955
MSRP: $999|Avg: $50
65%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The E-240 (2011) utilizes 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE-240Pentium 4 2.40
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($193)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium 4 2.40 (2004) relies on 90 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE-240Pentium 4 2.40
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($193)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Pentium 4 2.40

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Pentium 4 2.40

The Pentium 4 2.40 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 325 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the E-240 and Pentium 4 2.40 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 2.4 GHz on the Pentium 4 2.40 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Pentium 4 2.40. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Pentium 4 2.40 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (90 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Pentium 4 2.40's 325 — a 3.9% lead for the E-240. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureE-240Pentium 4 2.40
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz+60%
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
1 MB+100%
Process
40 nm-56%
90 nm
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
338+4%
325
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium 4 2.40 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-240Pentium 4 2.40
Socket
FT1
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
400
Max RAM Capacity
4
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-240) / false (Pentium 4 2.40).

FeatureE-240Pentium 4 2.40
Integrated GPU
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
false