E-240
VS
Ryzen 7 5800X

E-240 vs Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD

E-240

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5800X

8 Cores16 Thrd105 WWMax: 4.7 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The E-240 is positioned at rank #1169 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar E-240

#1157
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
4340%
#1158
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
4277%
#1159
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3926%
#1160
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3908%
#1161
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3872%
#1163
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3740%
#1164
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
3586%
#1165
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
3580%
#1166
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
3484%
#1169
E-240
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1170
Celeron 1047UE
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
100%
#1171
Core M-5Y70
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1172
Celeron U3400
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
99%
#1173
Celeron T1600
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
99%
#1174
Pro A12-8800B
MSRP: $400|Avg: $40
99%
#1176
Core i7-2637M
MSRP: $289|Avg: N/A
97%
#1177
Athlon PRO 3045B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $180
96%
#1178
Core 2 Duo SL9600
MSRP: $316|Avg: N/A
96%
#1179
Core 2 Duo T5600
MSRP: $241|Avg: N/A
96%
#1180
Pentium N3510
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
96%
#1181
Core i7-7Y75
MSRP: $393|Avg: $285
95%
#1183
Core i7-4500U
MSRP: $398|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 5800X

#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
105%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
104%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
104%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
104%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
103%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
103%
#46
Core i5-13490F
MSRP: $235|Avg: $170
102%
#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
102%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
101%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
101%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
101%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
101%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
101%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
101%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
101%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
100%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
100%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
99%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
99%
#59
Core i5-9500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $65
98%
#60
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9955WX
MSRP: $429|Avg: $450
98%
#61
Core i9-9960X
MSRP: $1684|Avg: $200
97%
#62
Core Ultra 5 225T
MSRP: $240|Avg: $180
97%
#63
Ryzen 3 3300X
MSRP: $120|Avg: $90
97%
#64
Core i5-12600K
MSRP: $289|Avg: $185
97%
#65
Core Ultra 5 235
MSRP: $257|Avg: $269
96%
#66
Ryzen 7 5700
MSRP: $179|Avg: $164
96%
#67
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $90
96%
#68
Ryzen 3 4100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
96%
#69
Ryzen 9 9900X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $370
96%
#70
Ryzen 5 7600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $185
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 5800X (2020) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightE-240Ryzen 7 5800X
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Zacate (2011−2013) / 40 nm)
✨ Modern (Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The E-240 (2011) relies on 40 nm technology and **DDR3 Single-channel**, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightE-240Ryzen 7 5800X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($180)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of E-240 and Ryzen 7 5800X

AMD

E-240

The E-240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: FT1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3 Single-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 338 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5800X

The Ryzen 7 5800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,712 points. Launch price was $449.

Processing Power

The E-240 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Ryzen 7 5800X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 5800X has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the E-240 versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5800X — a 103.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5800X. The E-240 uses the Zacate (2011−2013) architecture (40 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the E-240 scores 338 against the Ryzen 7 5800X's 27,712 — a 195.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 5800X. L3 cache: 0 kB on the E-240 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 5800X.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 7 5800X
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
8 / 16+700%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
4.7 GHz+213%
Base Clock
3.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
32 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512K (per core)
Process
40 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-83%
Architecture
Zacate (2011−2013)
Vermeer (Zen 3) (2020−2022)
PassMark
338
27,712+8099%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The E-240 uses the FT1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 5800X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 7 5800X
Socket
FT1
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (E-240) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 5800X). Primary use case: Ryzen 7 5800X targets Desktop.

FeatureE-240Ryzen 7 5800X
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop